clip_image002[5]

clip_image004[6]

What are the liabilities of a lazy, violence-fetishizing generational warfare position, which ignores actual conditions on the ground in favor of rhetorical bombast? In case it isn’t clear:

clip_image006

clip_image008

It’s so easy to mistake cleavages in the working class as substantive capitalist antagonisms that you can jump right to race war in one easy step! After all, if you are “fighting the capitalist state” we can justify practically anything after the fact. Go for it. La historia te absolverá.

Some people will tell you it feels good to call other workers “old,” that threatening the meager resources of our cat-food-eating forebears draws on “affect.” They may even claim this is “material” to make it sound more like Marxism and less like bargain-basement Oedipalism. At the risk of getting too Godwin’s Law on you, there’s a historical precedent here. The Nazis explained Kristallnacht exactly the same way: as a spontaneous outburst of public feeling, an embodied feeling of outrage. And, lest we forget, this country tried to base a Left movement off generational tension. It produced the baby boomers.

So a bit of advice to our comrades in the clownish Left. Next time you get pissed off at your parents, think a bit more objectively. If your parents are part of the bourgeoisie, then they might indeed be the enemy. But then again, you might be too. Don’t expect the Left to help you claim your inheritance early.

 
  • Seth Ackerman

    Goddamit, where’s the like button here?

    LIKE LIKE LIKE LIKE LIKE

  • John Gulick

    Will Mr. Harris be blarghing at Jacobin again?

  • Brown

    daaaaamn them’s fightin’ words. diggin’ it

  • Andrew Bossie

     I think a good way to think of why the analogy with the Jews is inappropriate is that The Elders of Zion was a forgery.  However, “Material Girl” and the “Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act” are legitimate records of misdeeds.

  • Coleman

    I know a couple of friends who were confused by this whole thing.

  • Alphonsevanworden

    Harris sounds like a nut but the theme’ is straight from the ruling class’ pr agency because “Wall Street” is after Social Security, the last asset the citizenry owns, and that’s the top of the ruling class agenda.

  • Birdman

    Harris’ logic sounds like that classic borrowed kettle joke that Zizek is known for: First it’s about young people doing bad, then when that doesn’t work it’s about a basic “material divide” (which is a sort of stupid, re-hashed and bland starting point) and then finally, when it’s clear he sounds retarded, it’s about “forcing a rupture in the capitalist state.” Just classic.

  • Anonymous

    I think the blog article misunderstands the capitalist power structure and how it relates to the family.

    Didn’t your dad (or mom!) ever tell you: “As long as you live in my house, you live by my rules”?  Or even, “When you start paying rent, you can live however you want”?

    Husbands used their capitalism-granted economic power to dominate their wives.  Now the wives are doing much better (on average).  But the children are still dominated.  In their dependency, they are even vulnerable to physical and sexual assault. This is serious business.

    So yes, everyone above you on the hierarchy is part of “the enemy”, even though most of them aren’t on the top.

  • http://twitter.com/ohtarzie Tarzie

    Nice answer to New York’s most irritating person.